top of page
Search

Ep 69 - Back Porch Files: Is the War Powers Act Unconstitutional?

  • 2 days ago
  • 3 min read

The Constitution says Congress declares war.


That’s the theory, anyway.


In practice, modern presidents tend to treat Congress less like a co-equal branch of government and more like the customer feedback department after military action is already underway. Missiles fly first. Hearings happen later. Statements are issued. Senators appear on cable news looking “deeply concerned.” Then the next crisis arrives and the cycle begins again.


Presidents inherited expanded war powers. Few ever gave them back.
Presidents inherited expanded war powers. Few ever gave them back.

Which is why recent comments from Marco Rubio landed with such strange force. Rubio argued that the War Powers Resolution itself may be unconstitutional, adding that presidents from both parties have believed that for decades.


At first glance, that sounds absurd. The War Powers Resolution was designed specifically to restrain presidential war-making after Vietnam. How could limiting unilateral military power violate the Constitution?


But the uncomfortable truth is this: Rubio’s argument is not some fringe theory invented in a dark corner of the internet. Presidents from both parties have quietly resisted the War Powers Resolution for generations, often complying with it only partially while signaling they do not fully accept its constitutional legitimacy.


That tension reveals something bigger than one law from 1973.


It reveals how dramatically the balance of war powers in America has shifted.


The founders were deeply suspicious of concentrated executive authority, especially when it came to war. That fear shaped the Constitution itself. Congress was given the power to declare war because the founders understood something timeless about human nature: leaders often find war politically useful. War consolidates power. War creates urgency. War rallies nationalism. And executives, throughout history, have rarely been eager to surrender authority once crisis grants it to them.


James Madison warned that the executive branch would be “most interested in war, and most prone to it.” Two centuries later, that warning feels less like distant political philosophy and more like an eerily accurate diagnosis of modern government.


The problem is that the world changed faster than the Constitution did.


Modern warfare moves quickly. Threats evolve rapidly. Terrorism, cyber conflict, proxy wars, drone strikes, and special operations do not resemble the traditional wars the founders imagined. Presidents argue, with some justification, that they need flexibility to respond immediately to threats. Congress, meanwhile, is slow, divided, and frequently dysfunctional.


That argument has allowed executive military authority to expand steadily over decades.


Not through one dramatic constitutional collapse, but incrementally.


The Korean War was fought without a formal declaration of war. Vietnam escalated through vague congressional authorization. After 9/11, the Authorization for Use of Military Force became the legal foundation for military operations stretching across multiple countries and multiple presidencies. Presidents inherited broad powers from their predecessors, then found reasons to preserve or expand them.


Republicans did it.


Democrats did it.


Presidents who campaigned against executive overreach often embraced expansive authority once they occupied the Oval Office themselves.


That pattern matters because power accumulated during emergencies rarely disappears afterward. Temporary authority has a way of becoming permanent infrastructure.


And Congress often appears strangely comfortable with that arrangement.


Publicly, lawmakers complain about executive overreach. Institutionally, however, many benefit from avoiding politically dangerous war votes themselves. Presidents absorb the immediate accountability while Congress retains the ability to criticize outcomes after the fact. The constitutional tension remains unresolved because unresolved tension has become politically convenient.


Meanwhile, the American public has gradually normalized permanent military engagement. Airstrikes, troop deployments, counterterror operations, and regional escalations now blend into the background noise of modern life. The country can drift into another military confrontation and most citizens barely pause long enough to ask who authorized it.


That normalization may be the most significant constitutional development of all.


Because the central question is no longer simply whether the War Powers Resolution is constitutional. The deeper question is whether the United States still meaningfully operates under the war powers framework the founders envisioned.


Congress still technically possesses the authority to declare war.


But somewhere along the way, that began feeling less like a binding constitutional requirement and more like a ceremonial relic from an earlier version of American democracy.



Sources


James Madison Quote on Executive War Powers - https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-06-02-0200

Congressional Research Service: The War Powers Resolution - https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R42699

Congressional Research Service: Declarations of War and Authorizations for Use of Military Force - https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46544

Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001) - https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ40/PLAW-107publ40.pdf

Obama Administration and Libya War Powers Controversy - https://www.justsecurity.org/1483/obama-administration-libya-war-powers-resolution/

Trump Soleimani Strike and War Powers Debate - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-50979463

Brookings Institution: The Imperial Presidency and War Powers - https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-imperial-presidency-is-alive-and-well/

National Constitution Center: War Powers Explained - https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-i/clauses/752

Council on Foreign Relations: U.S. War Powers and the Constitution - https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-war-powers-and-constitution

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet
Add a rating

© 2023 by Train of Thoughts. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page